abdev
07-14 06:34 AM
Here is the link
Visa Bulletin for August 2010 (http://www.travel.state.gov/visa/bulletin/bulletin_5092.html)
Visa Bulletin for August 2010 (http://www.travel.state.gov/visa/bulletin/bulletin_5092.html)
wallpaper Amanda Knox sits in court to
black_logs
01-27 04:01 PM
Everybody who wants to take part in CO meet the lawmakers drive please send me an email on black_logs@yahoo.com I'll arrange a conference call on Tue or wed next week(1/31/06-2/01/06)
martinvisalaw
10-12 04:51 PM
I'm sure the lawyers have already told you that this is not possible. The company cannot refile PERM now because all the ads, posting, etc are too old. They would have to start again.
2011 Amanda Knox: Amanda Knox tells
Temp_worker
08-21 07:41 PM
Friends, Please let me know your input-
Here is my backgound -
1.Current status working on H1B 8th year extension for company A
2.Labor and I-140 is approved � EB3 PD 04/2006 - Company A
3.485 pending applied in August 2007 (> 180 days) - Company A
4.EAD & AP approved - Company A
5.Wife on H4 Status not filed for her 485 as she was not here.
I want do H1b transfer & work for another company B -(Job code & job duties are little different)
I don't want to use AC21 - just continue with Company B on H1 B transfer.
I am doing H1b transfer nothing else once dates are current will add my wife.
Am I doing something wrong or screwing up my GC process?
Please advise
Here is my backgound -
1.Current status working on H1B 8th year extension for company A
2.Labor and I-140 is approved � EB3 PD 04/2006 - Company A
3.485 pending applied in August 2007 (> 180 days) - Company A
4.EAD & AP approved - Company A
5.Wife on H4 Status not filed for her 485 as she was not here.
I want do H1b transfer & work for another company B -(Job code & job duties are little different)
I don't want to use AC21 - just continue with Company B on H1 B transfer.
I am doing H1b transfer nothing else once dates are current will add my wife.
Am I doing something wrong or screwing up my GC process?
Please advise
more...
dce.deepak
07-29 01:03 PM
I think it takes a week or 10 days to get the receipt and it should have your case number
EB2IMMIGRANT
08-06 01:15 PM
Bump.
more...
amslonewolf
04-30 08:14 PM
http://www.reason.com/blog/show/119913.html
2010 Amanda Knox#39;s Sisters in Italy
tykishore
03-11 12:57 AM
Below is my situation regarding the change of status. Could you please help on this
My Wife Has entered US with H4 on April 16th 2006
Her H1 Visa Approved for her on : Oct 1st 2007
Worked on H1 with an Employer: May 2008 to Oct 2008
Later: From Oct 2008 to Now -- NO PAYSTUBS
Her employer advises her to cancel her H1 and change back to H4. Will there be any problem with this? And how do we go about it.
Also to add to the problem, I have actually filed my H1Visa extension which expires on May 09 and got an RFE on the same. My Employer is responding to the same. Based on this case, How do I go about applying for my wifes change of status
Would appreciate your help on this
My Wife Has entered US with H4 on April 16th 2006
Her H1 Visa Approved for her on : Oct 1st 2007
Worked on H1 with an Employer: May 2008 to Oct 2008
Later: From Oct 2008 to Now -- NO PAYSTUBS
Her employer advises her to cancel her H1 and change back to H4. Will there be any problem with this? And how do we go about it.
Also to add to the problem, I have actually filed my H1Visa extension which expires on May 09 and got an RFE on the same. My Employer is responding to the same. Based on this case, How do I go about applying for my wifes change of status
Would appreciate your help on this
more...
ca_immigrant
05-06 02:09 PM
Hi,
I had a quick question on about the package/application that is being used to build this forum ?
Can someone give me the name please ?
Is it a ready to go package or is it something with extensive customization ?
Thanks,
I had a quick question on about the package/application that is being used to build this forum ?
Can someone give me the name please ?
Is it a ready to go package or is it something with extensive customization ?
Thanks,
hair Amanda Knox#39;s friend Madison
sayonara
12-10 12:24 PM
Hello,
I have recently moved and did an Address update for my I 485 online this weekend. I noticed that there are LUDs on my EAD and AP application (I did not do an address update for these as these applications are not pending, I have received both few months ago).
Did anyone else experience a similar issue?
P.S Admins - I tried searching for any similar posts but the verification image doesnt display on my browser and i couldnt get any results. Please feel free to move this thread around or redirect to an existing one.
Thanks in advance
I have recently moved and did an Address update for my I 485 online this weekend. I noticed that there are LUDs on my EAD and AP application (I did not do an address update for these as these applications are not pending, I have received both few months ago).
Did anyone else experience a similar issue?
P.S Admins - I tried searching for any similar posts but the verification image doesnt display on my browser and i couldnt get any results. Please feel free to move this thread around or redirect to an existing one.
Thanks in advance
more...
brick2006
11-30 12:03 PM
hello...
I was on H1.. but i quit my job and i am currently enrolled as a Full time student.
I need to go to Mexico as part of my Study program....
I have received the change of status from USCIS..but i need to get my passport stamped..
I have not been successful in getting an appointment in Canada....
>> Can i go to mexico and get the visa stamped during my stay there..is it risky???
>> i cam here on F1-h1-now back to F1.... do i have to go to my country of origin to get my visa stamped.
inputs Pleaseeeee..
I was on H1.. but i quit my job and i am currently enrolled as a Full time student.
I need to go to Mexico as part of my Study program....
I have received the change of status from USCIS..but i need to get my passport stamped..
I have not been successful in getting an appointment in Canada....
>> Can i go to mexico and get the visa stamped during my stay there..is it risky???
>> i cam here on F1-h1-now back to F1.... do i have to go to my country of origin to get my visa stamped.
inputs Pleaseeeee..
hot Amanda Knox was #39;beaten by
jchang
04-20 07:44 PM
So I'm in need of an answer for my parents.
They have their green card and have been out of the United States for a little less than 6 months now visiting their homeland. They will be returning in a week but due to a medical circumstance that has happened with my mother overseas, she would need to go back to their homeland so she can acquire her medications and chemotherapy there. What is the minimum amount of time they would have to stay here in the United States until they can go back to their homeland?
I know you can stay out of U.S. for no more than 6 months or their green cards make be revoked, I understand that part but I'm curious if there is a minimum amount of time they'd have to stay here in the Unites States before they can go back overseas so it doesn't look bad when they go through immigration.
Thanks!
They have their green card and have been out of the United States for a little less than 6 months now visiting their homeland. They will be returning in a week but due to a medical circumstance that has happened with my mother overseas, she would need to go back to their homeland so she can acquire her medications and chemotherapy there. What is the minimum amount of time they would have to stay here in the United States until they can go back to their homeland?
I know you can stay out of U.S. for no more than 6 months or their green cards make be revoked, I understand that part but I'm curious if there is a minimum amount of time they'd have to stay here in the Unites States before they can go back overseas so it doesn't look bad when they go through immigration.
Thanks!
more...
house Amanda Knox: In the 47 minute
needhelp!
01-15 03:41 PM
bump!
tattoo Amanda Knox, the U.S. student convicted of killing her British flatmate in
JunRN
11-05 05:03 PM
That's nothing....2 LUDs within two or three days (apart from FP) can be something.
more...
pictures Picture of Amanda Knox:
damodharanl
08-04 11:00 AM
My visa H1-B nd h4 visa was expired on june 30 2010. I have got an job offer and they filed my H1-B petition after july 20 2010. I have submitted my I140 and mine & my wife I485 applications in EB1 category on Feb 22 2010. The gap between the H1b process is nearly 20 days period. The USCIS has approved my H1 but my wife's H4 was denied.
Here is my question. Whether they would have kept the I-94 for me. How can we proceed with H4 denial situation. Please give me some suggesion
Here is my question. Whether they would have kept the I-94 for me. How can we proceed with H4 denial situation. Please give me some suggesion
dresses Amanda Knox: Amanda Knox makes
snathan
02-06 08:50 PM
hI ATTY I am working under an h1b visa right now as of 2011. But i had a previous petitioned by another employer way back 2006. There was an I-140 filed but it was denied and I never heard from my petitioner then. I do have the USCIS copy and case number. Can I look for another employer and atty that could reopen the case?? Please help me. Thanks
No...you can not as I-140 is employer's property.
No...you can not as I-140 is employer's property.
more...
makeup house Amanda Knox Case Update:
pezz77
03-06 10:34 PM
I received my approval documents yesterday and today I noticed that my name is different from that displayed on my passport and previous H-1B approval.
I have a two-part last name and only the first part is displayed. Will this become an issue? The attorney tried to brush it off and said that the name was the same as the one on the petition (which of course he filled, so I don't know why he used this as an excuse).
I'd like to know if I need to do something about it. I don't want to have problems when exciting the country.
Any advice will be appreciated.
I have a two-part last name and only the first part is displayed. Will this become an issue? The attorney tried to brush it off and said that the name was the same as the one on the petition (which of course he filled, so I don't know why he used this as an excuse).
I'd like to know if I need to do something about it. I don't want to have problems when exciting the country.
Any advice will be appreciated.
girlfriend Amanda Knox Amanda Knox
srini1976
09-23 05:12 PM
EB 485 Numbers in Excel for easy reading and calculations
https://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0Agsah2P-Kr24dFM1dk9zOUVaVzR6RTFHMzlMSHpLLUE&hl=en
Thanks tempgc
https://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0Agsah2P-Kr24dFM1dk9zOUVaVzR6RTFHMzlMSHpLLUE&hl=en
Thanks tempgc
hairstyles Amanda Knox MySpace
10dulkar
08-04 01:13 PM
you are in serious trouble. Don't ask (illeagal)questions on this Pristine forum
Macaca
06-25 07:21 AM
Democrats step up (http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/editorials/la-ed-mileage25jun25,1,1445539.story) First on gun control, now on energy, the Democrats are pushing Congress in a new direction. June 25, 2007
FIRST GUN CONTROL, now fuel economy. Congressional Democrats still have a lot of work ahead to get their groundbreaking bills past both houses and the president's desk, but you can't say they're not leading a radical change in direction.
On June 13, the House passed what could become the first major gun-control law in a decade, a bill aimed at strengthening a federal database used in background checks for gun buyers. A week later, the Senate approved an energy bill that would improve mileage for the nation's automotive fleet for the first time in nearly 20 years. Democrats still haven't forced a troop reduction in Iraq or put their stamp on the nation's backward immigration policies, but their surprising success in other areas is worthy of praise.
Not that Democrats deserve all the credit. The gun bill was a bipartisan effort that passed by acclamation after it won the blessing of the National Rifle Assn., while 20 Republicans � nearly half the 43 who voted on the measure � backed the fuel economy bill. Still, these measures would have been inconceivable while Republicans controlled both houses during the first six years of the Bush administration, a period characterized by the disgraceful decision to allow a decade-old assault weapons ban to expire in 2004 and successive energy bills focused on maximizing fossil fuel production at the expense of the environment.
It would be nice to think that the broad Republican support for a progressive energy bill signaled a pro-environment change of heart. Unfortunately, it probably has more to do with the high price of oil; Republicans are feeling pressure to bring gas prices down. They also rightly see dependence on foreign oil as a national security issue. The fuel economy bill would increase the average mileage requirement for cars sold in the U.S. from 25 miles per gallon to 35 by 2020, expected to eventually save millions of barrels of oil a day.
Regardless of their motives, Republicans' support for the energy bill will increase pressure on President Bush to sign it, assuming it gets through the House. Bush favors better fuel economy but wants it to come at a slower pace, with loopholes to allow more gas guzzling by SUVs. The Senate energy bill has its own regrettable loophole: A strong mandate was watered down in committee, allowing federal regulators to cancel the improvements if they decide the tighter standards aren't "cost-effective." But senators beat back furious efforts by the auto industry to weaken the bill further.
There was one sour note to last week's passage of the energy bill: An amendment that would have required the nation to get 15% of its electricity from renewable sources was defeated. Senate leaders should revive it in the future.
FIRST GUN CONTROL, now fuel economy. Congressional Democrats still have a lot of work ahead to get their groundbreaking bills past both houses and the president's desk, but you can't say they're not leading a radical change in direction.
On June 13, the House passed what could become the first major gun-control law in a decade, a bill aimed at strengthening a federal database used in background checks for gun buyers. A week later, the Senate approved an energy bill that would improve mileage for the nation's automotive fleet for the first time in nearly 20 years. Democrats still haven't forced a troop reduction in Iraq or put their stamp on the nation's backward immigration policies, but their surprising success in other areas is worthy of praise.
Not that Democrats deserve all the credit. The gun bill was a bipartisan effort that passed by acclamation after it won the blessing of the National Rifle Assn., while 20 Republicans � nearly half the 43 who voted on the measure � backed the fuel economy bill. Still, these measures would have been inconceivable while Republicans controlled both houses during the first six years of the Bush administration, a period characterized by the disgraceful decision to allow a decade-old assault weapons ban to expire in 2004 and successive energy bills focused on maximizing fossil fuel production at the expense of the environment.
It would be nice to think that the broad Republican support for a progressive energy bill signaled a pro-environment change of heart. Unfortunately, it probably has more to do with the high price of oil; Republicans are feeling pressure to bring gas prices down. They also rightly see dependence on foreign oil as a national security issue. The fuel economy bill would increase the average mileage requirement for cars sold in the U.S. from 25 miles per gallon to 35 by 2020, expected to eventually save millions of barrels of oil a day.
Regardless of their motives, Republicans' support for the energy bill will increase pressure on President Bush to sign it, assuming it gets through the House. Bush favors better fuel economy but wants it to come at a slower pace, with loopholes to allow more gas guzzling by SUVs. The Senate energy bill has its own regrettable loophole: A strong mandate was watered down in committee, allowing federal regulators to cancel the improvements if they decide the tighter standards aren't "cost-effective." But senators beat back furious efforts by the auto industry to weaken the bill further.
There was one sour note to last week's passage of the energy bill: An amendment that would have required the nation to get 15% of its electricity from renewable sources was defeated. Senate leaders should revive it in the future.
zombie
03-08 03:54 PM
My case is like this, my original labor application was filed in Dec '04 under EB3 and it has been approved in Feb '07. Is it possible for me to file i140 in EB2. My paralegal says you can but just wanted to gather more information.
Thanks in advance!
Thanks in advance!
No comments:
Post a Comment