ilikekilo
03-13 04:12 PM
EB3 (India) moved 2 months. Good news. But then?
What you expect for Eb3 guys? What may be the trend in coming months?
2002....2003....2004.....?
sit and wait...until u get old.. u know i mean
What you expect for Eb3 guys? What may be the trend in coming months?
2002....2003....2004.....?
sit and wait...until u get old.. u know i mean
wallpaper Cool Girls with Cool Cars Cool
gimme_GC2006
07-18 08:20 PM
even though I am in EB2..from my personal experience, the kind of IT contracts/jobs/assignments we (most of us) do, I dont think there is anything that an EB2 qualified can do which EB3 cannot do.
I saw threads (this site or elsewhere) where EB2 ppl felt superior and blasted the threads where EB3-EB2 conversions were discussed.
IMHO, I would always say, if it is legal and possible and beneficial, ppl should think of conversion.
I saw threads (this site or elsewhere) where EB2 ppl felt superior and blasted the threads where EB3-EB2 conversions were discussed.
IMHO, I would always say, if it is legal and possible and beneficial, ppl should think of conversion.
ujjvalkoul
07-17 06:00 PM
Please see SKILL bill details:
Univ has to be accredited (google this word to c if ur Univ is)
Plus: MS/MBA has to be in same field u are applying GC for.
Univ has to be accredited (google this word to c if ur Univ is)
Plus: MS/MBA has to be in same field u are applying GC for.
2011 really cool backgrounds for
stucklabor
03-21 11:04 AM
Everyone, there seems to be some confusion about IV's strategy.
We recognize that there are some harmful provisions in these bills, but there are also a lot of good provisions.
We have the logic and numbers on our side, so our strategy is to present the facts and ask for the bad provisions to be removed, but we will still support the bills.
We recognize that there are some harmful provisions in these bills, but there are also a lot of good provisions.
We have the logic and numbers on our side, so our strategy is to present the facts and ask for the bad provisions to be removed, but we will still support the bills.
more...
H4_losing_hope
02-29 03:33 PM
I sent one letter each to IV and the President a few days back.
Thank you for joining the efforts :)
Thank you for joining the efforts :)
eb3India
06-08 01:53 PM
core team,
I really appreciate your effort and time spent on this cause, I understand this idea was discussed before.
Please update why this idea is bad, I know we can not sneak in any immigration bill thru budge or any other bill, but we should be able to bend few arms atleast to follow the law and use AC21 which is very subjective.
please give us your thoughts
I really appreciate your effort and time spent on this cause, I understand this idea was discussed before.
Please update why this idea is bad, I know we can not sneak in any immigration bill thru budge or any other bill, but we should be able to bend few arms atleast to follow the law and use AC21 which is very subjective.
please give us your thoughts
more...
svam77
07-23 11:34 AM
You got me wrong. I am not saying that, we are safe side filing this way.
Its better filing than not doing anything ....As simple as that .......
If people get their receipt, well and good ....or else just file and forget .....
But dont sit idle just because ur attornery does not want to file ....
Dont think too much about the mail room or the employees or the contractos there or whoever ...........As I said, if u have receipt well and good, or else just file with other docs, but do file ....
Its better filing than not doing anything ....As simple as that .......
If people get their receipt, well and good ....or else just file and forget .....
But dont sit idle just because ur attornery does not want to file ....
Dont think too much about the mail room or the employees or the contractos there or whoever ...........As I said, if u have receipt well and good, or else just file with other docs, but do file ....
2010 cool backgrounds for girls.
apb
12-11 02:12 PM
is bringing a logical explanation to the character of the fence sitters, I-RSVP-But-Do-Not-Show-Up-Nor-Will-I-Inform-
The-Person-Whom-I-RSVP-As-To-Why-I-Am-Unable-
To-Attend-An-Important-Chapter-Event, trolls, timid crowd.........
He is basically saying that some day you will get your GC and Citizenship but will always be Unhappy and searching for something in life. :) :cool::D
"If not now, then NEVER".....
Logiclife made the reference to two sets of people. One who thinks EAD is the end of the road and it is ok to RSVP and not participate thinkers (not all of them though) and second to a completely different group of people who always logs in anonymously who he references as THE LURKERS ON THIS SITE WHO WILL NEVER REGISTER OR DO ANYTHING AT ALL.
Logiclife uses the word cowards only for
THE LURKERS ON THIS SITE WHO WILL NEVER REGISTER OR DO ANYTHING AT ALL.
We have a tendency to get prejudiced with few postings and never look into the original posting and the spirit behind it as page progresses.
How many times we have organized something but were frustrated by lack of support from people around us.. including our loved ones sometimes.
Now considering the sacrifices and efforts that needhelp did, isn't it appropriate to let her know if there is any change in plan, just as any accountable team member would do.
I see that a great contributor "AMMA" has come out openly about her inability to come though she had always the right intention in making it. She had made efforts, put posters in organizing it but she could not make it. She should have told needhelp but it slipped. This happens. She apologized to needhelp and this shows tremendous courage, self respect and pride in herself. I salute you 'AMMA'
But how many of those people who said they will come but did not, nor they called/informed had even sent a private note of apology. If they had sent that I am sure needhelp would not have felt so frustrated.
If I defend unprofessional attitude then I am one. If I do not come out openly with my identity in this forum and logs in anonymously, than I am a coward. If I am supposed to contribute but do not then I am a shameful human. If I can't apologize for my inactions than I always will carry the guilt forever. If I am a free-rider knowing I am not supposed to be one than I do not belong to this IV team.
Maybe is better for me along with murthy's or Rajeev's forum. There I do not have to contribute, never be called shameful/coward and my weakness, integrity, self-respect, character, idendity, etc can never be exposed. I can network, gain insight into immigration process, and forever wait for my GC and track from V/Bulletin to AP and whine/complain/criticize/condemn anything and anybody.
The-Person-Whom-I-RSVP-As-To-Why-I-Am-Unable-
To-Attend-An-Important-Chapter-Event, trolls, timid crowd.........
He is basically saying that some day you will get your GC and Citizenship but will always be Unhappy and searching for something in life. :) :cool::D
"If not now, then NEVER".....
Logiclife made the reference to two sets of people. One who thinks EAD is the end of the road and it is ok to RSVP and not participate thinkers (not all of them though) and second to a completely different group of people who always logs in anonymously who he references as THE LURKERS ON THIS SITE WHO WILL NEVER REGISTER OR DO ANYTHING AT ALL.
Logiclife uses the word cowards only for
THE LURKERS ON THIS SITE WHO WILL NEVER REGISTER OR DO ANYTHING AT ALL.
We have a tendency to get prejudiced with few postings and never look into the original posting and the spirit behind it as page progresses.
How many times we have organized something but were frustrated by lack of support from people around us.. including our loved ones sometimes.
Now considering the sacrifices and efforts that needhelp did, isn't it appropriate to let her know if there is any change in plan, just as any accountable team member would do.
I see that a great contributor "AMMA" has come out openly about her inability to come though she had always the right intention in making it. She had made efforts, put posters in organizing it but she could not make it. She should have told needhelp but it slipped. This happens. She apologized to needhelp and this shows tremendous courage, self respect and pride in herself. I salute you 'AMMA'
But how many of those people who said they will come but did not, nor they called/informed had even sent a private note of apology. If they had sent that I am sure needhelp would not have felt so frustrated.
If I defend unprofessional attitude then I am one. If I do not come out openly with my identity in this forum and logs in anonymously, than I am a coward. If I am supposed to contribute but do not then I am a shameful human. If I can't apologize for my inactions than I always will carry the guilt forever. If I am a free-rider knowing I am not supposed to be one than I do not belong to this IV team.
Maybe is better for me along with murthy's or Rajeev's forum. There I do not have to contribute, never be called shameful/coward and my weakness, integrity, self-respect, character, idendity, etc can never be exposed. I can network, gain insight into immigration process, and forever wait for my GC and track from V/Bulletin to AP and whine/complain/criticize/condemn anything and anybody.
more...
chitta123
02-08 03:31 PM
I am in a lot of stress. Please help out if possible.
Six years on my H1B expire in April 2008. I just got laid off from company A. My last day of work will be May 31st. I have LC and I-140 approved with company A.
If I join company B starting June, and transfer my H1B to B, can it extend my H1B beyond 6 years based on the approved I-140 I had with company A? If yes, will it be for one year or three years?
Gurus please help. I will be grateful.
Thanks
Six years on my H1B expire in April 2008. I just got laid off from company A. My last day of work will be May 31st. I have LC and I-140 approved with company A.
If I join company B starting June, and transfer my H1B to B, can it extend my H1B beyond 6 years based on the approved I-140 I had with company A? If yes, will it be for one year or three years?
Gurus please help. I will be grateful.
Thanks
hair pinup girls wallpapers
piyu7444
09-12 07:28 PM
Hey guys
Just received email from CRIS regarding I-485 denial notice for both me and my wife.
I used AC21 after 9 months of filing I-485. My I-140 was approved before even filing I-485 in July fiasco.
My attorney promptly sent AC-21 and G-28 and i did see LUD on my and my wife's I-485 after that.
My previous company informed me sometime ago that they are going to revoke I-140 and probably they did and i am assuming that's what triggered this.
This is certainly a big damm mistake they did even after sending AC-21 docs and G-28.
Sorry to hear about this but
If your employer revoked I-140 after 180 days of filing 485 and you did work for the employer who filed 140 for 180 days after filing 485 you will win with USCIS. Wait for the denial notice to find the reason, then file for Motion to reopen with your lawyer's help.
Your employer should not have revoked 140 (bummer) and if he did it after 180 days it cant be the reason for denial unless someone at USCIS just did the job in their usual way (read they dont read rules which they should follow day to day)
Hope it helps! Good Luck
Just received email from CRIS regarding I-485 denial notice for both me and my wife.
I used AC21 after 9 months of filing I-485. My I-140 was approved before even filing I-485 in July fiasco.
My attorney promptly sent AC-21 and G-28 and i did see LUD on my and my wife's I-485 after that.
My previous company informed me sometime ago that they are going to revoke I-140 and probably they did and i am assuming that's what triggered this.
This is certainly a big damm mistake they did even after sending AC-21 docs and G-28.
Sorry to hear about this but
If your employer revoked I-140 after 180 days of filing 485 and you did work for the employer who filed 140 for 180 days after filing 485 you will win with USCIS. Wait for the denial notice to find the reason, then file for Motion to reopen with your lawyer's help.
Your employer should not have revoked 140 (bummer) and if he did it after 180 days it cant be the reason for denial unless someone at USCIS just did the job in their usual way (read they dont read rules which they should follow day to day)
Hope it helps! Good Luck
more...
.jpg "hot girls cool wallpapers")
ireddy
06-24 09:04 AM
Done
hot cool computer ackgrounds for
NolaIndian32
11-11 02:27 PM
Same sex marriage couples cannot sponser for GC?
But they can get Insurance coverage and family benifits from the state.
May be USCIS to prevent malpractice by the people to get the GC.
Wait a minute....are you saying that USCIS doesn't want ppl to falsify a perm residency application by faking a same-sex marriage and therefore there are no immigration benefits for same-sex couples?
Wow....let me share this with you: USCIS doesn't make up these rules; it stems from a US Law called DOMA - Defense of Marriage Act which only offers the 1,152 federal benefits of marriage to hetersexual couples.
The statement you make is rather disheartening; it implies that there is no falsification of heterosexual marriages today in an attempt to get a GC. It also implies that heterosexuals would fake a same-sex marriage to get a GC.... do you really think it is easy to fake any marriage? To what extent would a heterosexual man or woman endure and fake a same-sex relationship to get a GC? Be realistic, each and every marriage or "permanent partnership as contemplated by the UAFA bill" have to and "would have to" prove a valid relationship before a GC can be approved for that case by the IO at the time of interview.
This dialogue has veered off course from the main subject of this thread - I apologize for that. But sometimes sharing information can help enlighten others. Thanks for your patience with me.
-Nola
But they can get Insurance coverage and family benifits from the state.
May be USCIS to prevent malpractice by the people to get the GC.
Wait a minute....are you saying that USCIS doesn't want ppl to falsify a perm residency application by faking a same-sex marriage and therefore there are no immigration benefits for same-sex couples?
Wow....let me share this with you: USCIS doesn't make up these rules; it stems from a US Law called DOMA - Defense of Marriage Act which only offers the 1,152 federal benefits of marriage to hetersexual couples.
The statement you make is rather disheartening; it implies that there is no falsification of heterosexual marriages today in an attempt to get a GC. It also implies that heterosexuals would fake a same-sex marriage to get a GC.... do you really think it is easy to fake any marriage? To what extent would a heterosexual man or woman endure and fake a same-sex relationship to get a GC? Be realistic, each and every marriage or "permanent partnership as contemplated by the UAFA bill" have to and "would have to" prove a valid relationship before a GC can be approved for that case by the IO at the time of interview.
This dialogue has veered off course from the main subject of this thread - I apologize for that. But sometimes sharing information can help enlighten others. Thanks for your patience with me.
-Nola
more...
house cool backgrounds for girls
pritesh80
02-06 01:52 AM
URGENT HELP
Its a simple case. Its no company A, B, C and D and all applied for H1's or some vendors troubling me...so pls help.
I read all the posts on this thread but I dont think I got an answer I want. Here is my dilemma -
Scenario: I currently work for Company A. I interviewed with Company B and they are ready to file for my H1b transfer but they need me to join within the next 3 weeks. Today is Feb 6th 2008.
Question1) Is there anything like a H1Btransfer or is it a brand new application??
Question2) Does this H1B transfer go through the 65,000 quota system?? Is there a chance my H1B transfer can be rejected because I did not make it in the 65,000?
Question3) When can I start working for Company B?
Question4) Company B said that I should only inform Company A after I get a receipt from USCIS about my H1B transfer. If Company A matches up the salary what Company B is offering me after I inform them and I still havent started working with Company B, can I stay with Company A? If yes, What about the H1B transfer application by Company B?
Thanks in advance for your response.
Its a simple case. Its no company A, B, C and D and all applied for H1's or some vendors troubling me...so pls help.
I read all the posts on this thread but I dont think I got an answer I want. Here is my dilemma -
Scenario: I currently work for Company A. I interviewed with Company B and they are ready to file for my H1b transfer but they need me to join within the next 3 weeks. Today is Feb 6th 2008.
Question1) Is there anything like a H1Btransfer or is it a brand new application??
Question2) Does this H1B transfer go through the 65,000 quota system?? Is there a chance my H1B transfer can be rejected because I did not make it in the 65,000?
Question3) When can I start working for Company B?
Question4) Company B said that I should only inform Company A after I get a receipt from USCIS about my H1B transfer. If Company A matches up the salary what Company B is offering me after I inform them and I still havent started working with Company B, can I stay with Company A? If yes, What about the H1B transfer application by Company B?
Thanks in advance for your response.
tattoo really cool backgrounds for
ZeroComplexity
09-21 06:40 PM
I really admire that. I feel I missed out on all the satisfaction you get when you are proactive about something.
I was paranoid that all hell might break loose at work when I am gone. Nothing happened. I have to blame my paranoia.
Hey zerocomplexity & jay75:
We flew from Seattle on friday mrng at 5:30 am. Had a 5 hours lay over at LA. We wanted to be present & it was worth all the pains....
I was paranoid that all hell might break loose at work when I am gone. Nothing happened. I have to blame my paranoia.
Hey zerocomplexity & jay75:
We flew from Seattle on friday mrng at 5:30 am. Had a 5 hours lay over at LA. We wanted to be present & it was worth all the pains....
more...
pictures cool backgrounds for girls.
jthomas
03-14 11:25 PM
Should we send letters to the president about EB india category. The dates are moving very slowly..... etc..
we have to do something or it will take years to get GC
we have to do something or it will take years to get GC
dresses cool backgrounds for girls
gconmymind
04-30 04:45 PM
Did we?
Come on guys. Let us make 10K today. I am bringing my $50 pledge at 10K to 9K so it can help us reach 10K faster :)...
Come on guys. Let us make 10K today. I am bringing my $50 pledge at 10K to 9K so it can help us reach 10K faster :)...
more...
makeup really cool backgrounds for
nrakkati
03-20 08:10 PM
H1 is always new? it could be, but not in case of a transfer
Any way good luck.
Can someone explain me how can i find a H1b is new or transferred?
I got all my H1B photocopies. Does it(new or transferred) show on H1B Document?
Thank you
Any way good luck.
Can someone explain me how can i find a H1b is new or transferred?
I got all my H1B photocopies. Does it(new or transferred) show on H1B Document?
Thank you
girlfriend Wallpapers - Cool Girls HQ
gc_on_demand
06-26 08:21 AM
bump
hairstyles hot girls cool wallpapers
drirshad
11-24 07:09 PM
It is one way to reduce the budget deficit, each of us will be burning away $700- every year per head for AP + EAD renewal with close to a million applicants go do the maths.
And AP/EAD renewal cannot start before 120 days so that time period every year for at least 3 years they are gonna laugh their guts out.
And we thought we achieved a big feat with the July fiasco ......
And AP/EAD renewal cannot start before 120 days so that time period every year for at least 3 years they are gonna laugh their guts out.
And we thought we achieved a big feat with the July fiasco ......
ciber.couger
09-21 11:03 PM
Hi,
I am from Jordan and I attended the rally. 4 of my friends "who are Jordanian and have their citizenships already" drove from Chicago to attend the rally, but they got lost in Baltimore. They wish all of us all the luck and they support all of us 100%:)
That have been said and as I mentioned on another threat, I know 10 people from India who work with me and promised to meet me there, but no one of them attended, and I called them before the rally at their offices and all of them were there. I am very disappointed of them.:mad:
I am from Jordan and I attended the rally. 4 of my friends "who are Jordanian and have their citizenships already" drove from Chicago to attend the rally, but they got lost in Baltimore. They wish all of us all the luck and they support all of us 100%:)
That have been said and as I mentioned on another threat, I know 10 people from India who work with me and promised to meet me there, but no one of them attended, and I called them before the rally at their offices and all of them were there. I am very disappointed of them.:mad:
gapala
03-05 11:08 AM
http://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/CISOmbudsman_RR_2_Streamlining_Employment_Based_Im migrant_Processing_USCIS_Response_04-27-06.pdf
"On April 27, 2004, the Ombudsman sent an information request to USCIS for a breakdown of data for pending employment-based applications for adjustment of status to be broken down by preference classification, priority date and country of chargeability. This request attempted to reflect similar data contained within the Immigration Annual Statistical Handbook, Chart 5, for completed cases. The Ombudsman�s interest in pending employment-based workload is in part a reflection of the broader issue relating to USCIS� ability to support the Department of State in accurately forecasting immigrant visa requirements and the visa issuance process."
"This update will enable USCIS to identify 100% of the pending employment-based visa cases. It is anticipated that this exercise will be completed by April 28, 2006. Once this exercise is complete, USCIS will be able to extract data relating to the priority date, country of chargeability and preference classification. USCIS has already entered into discussions with the Department of State to provide this detailed information not only for pending workload but for visa regressed cases as well to allow DOS to accurately manage future visa allocations in regressed workloads."
[updated]
http://www.aila.org/content/fileviewer.aspx?docid=22650&linkid=162315
so are we getting anything different from what the ombudsman has already requested (and received?)
Didn't we request for the same information, other than priority date stuff, that Ombudsman was looking for in 2006, does anybody know whether CIS provided him what he requested for?
Can't they reuse the same "program", as they call it, to provide us the info that we requested for? I would suggest to atleast include a reference to this Ombudsman's request in our reply letter.
I am in for contribution too.
"On April 27, 2004, the Ombudsman sent an information request to USCIS for a breakdown of data for pending employment-based applications for adjustment of status to be broken down by preference classification, priority date and country of chargeability. This request attempted to reflect similar data contained within the Immigration Annual Statistical Handbook, Chart 5, for completed cases. The Ombudsman�s interest in pending employment-based workload is in part a reflection of the broader issue relating to USCIS� ability to support the Department of State in accurately forecasting immigrant visa requirements and the visa issuance process."
"This update will enable USCIS to identify 100% of the pending employment-based visa cases. It is anticipated that this exercise will be completed by April 28, 2006. Once this exercise is complete, USCIS will be able to extract data relating to the priority date, country of chargeability and preference classification. USCIS has already entered into discussions with the Department of State to provide this detailed information not only for pending workload but for visa regressed cases as well to allow DOS to accurately manage future visa allocations in regressed workloads."
[updated]
http://www.aila.org/content/fileviewer.aspx?docid=22650&linkid=162315
so are we getting anything different from what the ombudsman has already requested (and received?)
Didn't we request for the same information, other than priority date stuff, that Ombudsman was looking for in 2006, does anybody know whether CIS provided him what he requested for?
Can't they reuse the same "program", as they call it, to provide us the info that we requested for? I would suggest to atleast include a reference to this Ombudsman's request in our reply letter.
I am in for contribution too.
No comments:
Post a Comment